Print this page

ALPINE
Antihypertensive treatment and Lipid Profile In a North of Sweden Efficacy evaluation
Author(s)
Lindholm LH, Persson M, Alaupovic P, Carlberg B, Svensson A, Samuelsson O
Title(s)
Metabolic outcome during 1 year in newly detected hypertensives: results of the Antihypertensive Treatment and Lipid Profile in a North of Sweden Efficacy Evaluation (ALPINE study)
Reference(s)
J Hypertens 2003;21:1563-74
Disease
Hypertension
Purpose
To compare the long-term effects of treatment with a low-dose diuretic (hydrochlorothiazide, HCTZ), alone or in combination with a beta-blocker (atenolol), with that of an angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker (candesartan), alone or in combination with a calcium antagonist (felodipine), in newly diagnosed patients with primary hypertension
Study design
Randomised, double-blind, controlled, parallel-group
Follow-up
1 year
Patients
392 patients (196 candesartan, 196 HCTZ), mean age 55 years, with newly diagnosed primary hypertension (sitting BP 140-179/90-104 mm Hg)
Treatment regimen
Candesartan cilexetil, 16 mg, or HCTZ, 25 mg
Concomitant therapy
If sitting SBP or DBP was above the target pressure (< 130/ < 85 mm Hg, for patients aged < 65 years, or < 140/< 90 mm Hg, if aged > 65 years) at any visit during the treatment period, double-blind treatment with felodipine extended release, 2.5-5.0 mg, was added to candesartan, and atenolol, 50-100 mg, was added to HCTZ
Results
65% of patients in the candesartan group and 62% in the HCTZ group attained a BP < 140/< 90 mm Hg. Fasting serum insulin and plasma glucose levels increased in the HCTZ group compared to unaffected levels in the candesartan group. Diabetes mellitus was diagnosed in 4.1% of patients in the HCTZ group and in 0.5% in the candesartan group (p = 0.03). The ratio between LDL cholesterol and HDL cholesterol was reduced in the candesartan group and increased in the HCTZ group (p < 0.01). The effect on triglycerides was also significantly different, with a minor increase in the plasma levels with candesartan and a larger increase with HCTZ (p < 0.001). Serum potassium decreased in the HCTZ group and increased slightly in the candesartan group (0.27 vs +0.07 mmol/l; p < 0.001). Significantly less patients reported adverse events in the candesartan group
Comments
The results of a cost-effectiveness analysis have been published in J Hypertens 2006;24 Suppl 1:S65–72
What's What

Back