|
ADMIRAL
Abciximab before Direct angioplasty and stenting in Myocardial Infarction Regarding Acute and Long-term follow-up
 |
Author(s) |
(a) Montalescot G, Barragan P, Wittenberg O, Ecollan P, Elhadad S, Villain P, Boulenc JM, Maillard L, Pinton P (b) Ecollan P, Montalescot G, De La Coussaye JE, Vaque J, Bollaert PE, Barragan P, Pinton P (c) Montalescot G, Barragan P, Wittenberg O, Ecollan P, Elhadad S, Villain P, Boulenc J-M, Maillard L, Pinton P
|
 |
Title(s) |
(a) Abciximab associated with primary angioplasty and stenting in acute myocardial infarction: the ADMIRAL study, 30-day results (b) Prehospital abciximab administration in the ADMIRAL study (c) Abciximab associated with primary angioplasty and stenting in acute myocardial infarction: the ADMIRAL study, 30-day final results
|
 |
Reference(s) |
(a) Eur Heart J 1999;20:170 (b) Circulation 1999;100 Suppl I:I-86 (c) Circulation 1999;100 Suppl I:I-87
|
 |
Disease |
AMI
|
 |
Purpose |
To investigate whether early administration of abciximab can improve TIMI flow and clinical outcomes in patients with AMI referred for urgent primary PTCA
|
 |
Study design |
Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled
|
 |
Follow-up |
24 h, 30 days, 6 months
|
 |
Patients |
300 patients with evolving AMI of < 12 h, referred for urgent primary PTCA
|
 |
Treatment regimen |
Abciximab, 0.25 mg bolus, followed by 0.125 µg/kg/min for 12 h, or placebo
|
 |
Concomitant therapy |
Aspirin (6 months) and ticlopidine (1 month for stent implantation). Unfractionated heparin given according to the EPILOG criteria
|
 |
Results |
PTCA was performed in 93.1% and stents were implanted in 85.8% of the patients. Patients administered abciximab prehospital had a shorter mean delay to treatment than those administered abciximab in hospital (174 ± 122 min vs 221 ± 150 min; p = 0.15) with better average TIMI (1.4 ± 1.4 vs 0.6 ± 1.1; p = 0.006, and 2.8 ± 1.1 vs 1.7 ± 1.2; p = 0.01) and TIMI 3 (36.0% vs 12.0%; p = 0.004, and 96% vs 78%; p = 0.01) flow rates on immediate and 24-h angiograms, respectively. Coronary stenosis was lower grade (84.6 ± 27.2 vs 94.2 ± 19.0; p = 0.04) in patients treated prehospital. Initial (21.0% vs 10.3%; p < 0.01) and 24-h (85.6% vs 78.4%; p < 0.05) TIMI 3 flow rates were significantly better in the abciximab group. Left ventricular function was significantly improved at 24 h (54.6 ± 12.3% vs 51.4 ± 12.6%; p < 0.05). At 30 days, there was a significant reduction (-46.5%) in the combined primary endpoint of death, recurrent MI and urgent revascularisation with abciximab compared to placebo (10.7% vs 20.0%; p < 0.03)
|
 |
|
|