Print this page

NAVIGATOR
Nateglinide And Valsartan in Impaired Glucose Tolerance Outcomes Research
Ongoing trial
Author(s)
(a) Califf RM, Boolell M, Haffner SM, Bethel MA, McMurray J, Duggal A, Holman RR
(b) NAVIGATOR Study Group
(c) NAVIGATOR Study Group
Title(s)
(a) Prevention of diabetes and cardiovascular disease in patients with impaired glucose tolerance: rationale and design of the Nateglinide And Valsartan in Impaired
Glucose Tolerance Outcomes Research (NAVIGATOR) Trial
(b) Effect of nateglinide on the incidence of diabetes and cardiovascular events
(c) Effect of valsartan on the incidence of diabetes and cardiovascular events
Reference(s)
(a) Am Heart J 2008;156:623–32
(b) N Engl J Med 2010;362:1463–76
(c) N Engl J Med 2010;362:1477–90
Disease
Cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus
Purpose
To investigate whether treatment with nateglinide or valsartan can reduce progression to diabetes and new cardiovascular events in patients with or at high risk of cardiovascular disease and impaired glucose tolerance
Study design
Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2 x 2 factorial
Follow-up
Median 5.0, 6.3 and 6.4 years for data on the diabetes, extended cardiovascular and core cardiovascular outcomes, respectively
Patients
9518 patients, with impaired glucose tolerance, aged ≥ 50 years, if with diagnosed cardiovascular disease, or ≥ 55 years, if at risk of cardiovascular disease
Treatment regimen
Nateglinide, 30–60 mg tid, valsartan, 80–160 mg/day, their combination, or placebo
Concomitant therapy
Lifestyle intervention programme
Results
9306 patients (nateglinide vs placebo analysis: 4645 nateglinide, 4661 placebo; valsartan vs placebo analysis: 4631 valsartan, 4675 placebo) were included in the analyses. In the nateglinide vs placebo analysis, diabetes developed in 36.0% of patients in the nateglinide group and 33.9% in the placebo group (hazard ratio 1.07, 95% CI 1.00–1.15; p = 0.05). The extended composite cardiovascular outcome of death from a cardiovascular cause, nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke, hospitalisation for heart failure, arterial revascularisation or hospitalisation for unstable angina pectoris occurred in 14.2% of patients receiving nateglinide and 15.2% of those receiving placebo (hazard ratio 0.93, 95% CI 0.83–1.03; p = 0.16). The core composite cardiovascular outcome of death from a cardiovascular cause, nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke or hospitalisation for heart failure was reached in 7.9% of patients with nateglinide and in 8.3% with placebo (hazard ratio 0.94, 95% CI 0.82–1.09; p = 0.43). In the valsartan vs placebo analysis, diabetes developed in significantly fewer patients in the valsartan group than in the placebo group (33.1% vs 36.8%, hazard ratio 0.86, 95% CI 0.80–0.92; p < 0.001). Compared to placebo, valsartan did not reduce the incidence of either the extended cardiovascular outcome (14.5% vs 14.8%, hazard ratio 0.96, 95% CI, 0.86–1.07; p = 0.43) or the core cardiovascular outcome (8.1% vs 8.1%, hazard ratio 0.99, 95% CI 0.86–1.14; p = 0.85)
Comments
Data on alanine aminotransferase levels and the metabolic syndrome in the NAVIGATOR population have been published in Diabet Med 2009;26:1204–11
What's What

Back