Print this page

RECORD
Rosiglitazone Evaluated for Cardiac Outcomes and Regulation of glycaemia in Diabetes
Ongoing trial
Author(s)
(a) Home PD, Pocock SJ, Beck-Nielsen H, Gomis R, Hanefeld M, Dargie H, Komajda M, Gubb J, Biswas N, Jones NP
(b) Home PD, Pocock SJ, Beck-Nielsen H, Gomis R, Hanefeld M, Jones NP, Komajda M, McMurray JJV
Title(s)
(a) Rosiglitazone Evaluated for Cardiac Outcomes and Regulation of Glycaemia in Diabetes (RECORD): study design and protocol
(b) Rosiglitazone evaluated for cardiovascular outcomes – an interim analysis
Reference(s)
(a) Diabetologia 2005;48:1726–35
(b) N Engl J Med 2007;357:28–38
Disease
Diabetes mellitus
Purpose
To evaluate the effects of rosiglitazone on cardiovascular outcomes and long-term glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes
Study design
Randomised, open, parallel-group
Follow-up
Aim 6 years
Patients
4447 patients (2220 rosiglitazone, 2227 control), aged 40–75 years, with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycaemic control (HbA1c 7.1–9.0%) with metformin or sulphonylurea
Treatment regimen
Metformin, standard dose, plus rosiglitazone, 4 mg/day, or sulphonylurea, standard dose. Alternatively, sulphonylurea plus rosiglitazone, 4 mg/day, or metformin. If HbA1c ≥ 8.5% after 8 weeks, combination therapy with sulphonylurea and metformin plus rosiglitazone or insulin
Results
An unplanned interim analysis at a mean follow-up of 3.75 years showed that there were no significant differences between the rosiglitazone group and the control group in time to first cardiovascular hospitalisation or death (217 vs 202 events, hazard ratio 1.08, 95% CI 0.89–1.31; p = 0.43). There were no statistically significant differences between groups in incidence of AMI, death from cardiovascular causes or any cause, or the composite of cardiovascular death, MI and stroke. Patients in the rosiglitazone group had a significantly higher risk of congestive heart failure than those in the control group (38 vs 17, hazard ratio 2.24, 95% CI 1.27–3.97; p = 0.006)
What's What

Back