CHDArrhythmiasDiabetesLipidologyHeart FailureHypertensionStrokeThrombosis
Log in
Username
Password
Bookmark this site|Register Me|Forgotten Password
Welcome to InCirculation.net
InCirculation.net is a professional cardiovascular resource intended for a global audience of specialists, generalists, researchers, and other healthcare professionals
Would you like to know what else InCirculation.net has to offer? Take the tour of InCirculation.net
Click here to register

Cardiovascular News



Page summary
Text size
News quick search
Cardiovascular news provides daily news updates to help you stay informed.
 

Long-term target lesion revascularization, adverse events low with SES


27 March 2008

MedWire News: Patients treated with sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) have low constant rates of target lesion revascularization, stent thrombosis, and major cardiac adverse events over time, Israeli researchers report.

"Our study convincingly demonstrated that off-label use is an important risk factor for adverse events and that the increased risk attributed to off-label use continues over time of follow-up," the authors add.

David Planer (Rambam Medical Centre, Haifa) and colleagues evaluated long-term (3.4 years) clinical outcomes in 479 patients treated with SES who were enrolled in the Israeli arm of the e-Cypher registry.

During the 3.4 years of follow-up, 6.3% of the patients died (3.9% cardiac and 2.4% non-cardiac deaths).

Overall, 4.0% of patients had stent thrombosis, 9.9% had target lesion revascularization, and 16.3% experienced major adverse cardiac events - a combination of death, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization.

The researchers note that the rate of in-stent restenosis remained relatively low, and the incidence of late-stent thrombosis was constant throughout the follow-up period.

Renal failure, stent length, and off-label use of SES independently predicted stent thrombosis, with hazard ratios of 9.6, 1.1, and 5.3, respectively.

Notably, 87% of stent thrombosis cases and 85% of all major adverse cardiac events occurred in patients receiving SES for off-label indications.

"A critical question that remains open is what is the added risk for adverse events associated with off-label indications compared with the benefit of significantly reducing target lesion revascularization in this high-risk patient population," Planer and co-workers write in the American Journal of Cardiology.

Am J Cardiol 2008; 101: 953-959



© Copyright Current Medicine Group Ltd, 2008

Related Content

All rights reserved. This website is intended for an international audience. Privacy PolicyLegal NoticeTerms and Conditions