CHDArrhythmiasDiabetesLipidologyHeart FailureHypertensionStrokeThrombosis
Log in
Username
Password
Bookmark this site|Register Me|Forgotten Password
Welcome to InCirculation.net
InCirculation.net is a professional cardiovascular resource intended for a global audience of specialists, generalists, researchers, and other healthcare professionals
Would you like to know what else InCirculation.net has to offer? Take the tour of InCirculation.net
Click here to register

Cardiovascular News



Page summary
Text size
News quick search
Cardiovascular news provides daily news updates to help you stay informed.
 

CDI 'viable treatment option' for massive PE


15 August 2008

MedWire News: Catheter-directed intervention (CDI) should be included in the armamentarium for massive pulmonary embolism (PE), results from a case series suggest.

The research, published in the journal Chest, describes the outcome of 12 patients who were treated by suction embolectomy and fragmentation, with or without local thrombolysis.

"In the setting of hemodynamic shock from massive PE, CDI is potentially a life-saving treatment for patients who have not responded to or cannot tolerate systemic thrombolysis," say William Kuo and co-authors, from Stanford University Medical Center in California, USA.

The team reviewed medical records for 12 patients who underwent CDI between 1997 and 2006 for angiographically confirmed massive PE with hemodynamic shock. Eight patients also received catheter-guided thrombolysis and 10 received an inferior vena cava filter.

Seven patients were treated with CDI secondary to failed systemic tissue plasminogen activator treatment, while five patients underwent primary CDI due to thrombolysis contraindications.

Overall, 100% of the procedures were technically successful and none of the patients experienced major complications.

Ten (83%) patients experienced significant hemodynamic improvement, defined as a shock index of less than 9, and were stable until they left hospital, after an average of 20 days. The remaining two patients died within 24 hours of CDI.

"Although CDI involves catheterization of the pulmonary arteries, it is much less invasive than open surgical embolectomy," Kuo et al note.

"When patients are poor candidates for systemic thrombolysis and surgical embolectomy, CDI may be the only viable treatment option and should be pursued if available."

Acknowledging the lack of a widely accepted protocol for CDI, the team concludes: "Prospective large-scale studies are needed to further validate the safety and effectiveness of CDI and to determine its ideal role in the management algorithm for PE."

Chest 2008; 134: 250-254



© Copyright Current Medicine Group Ltd, 2008

Related Content

All rights reserved. This website is intended for an international audience. Privacy PolicyLegal NoticeTerms and Conditions